こちらからもご購入いただけます
オズ はじまりの戦い DVD(デジタルコピー付き)
購入オプションとあわせ買い
フォーマット | 字幕付き, ドルビー, 吹き替え, 色, ワイドスクリーン |
コントリビュータ | ミシェル・ウィリアムズ, レイチェル・ワイズ, ジェームズ・フランコ, サム・ライミ, ザック・ブラフ, ミラ・クニス |
言語 | 英語, 日本語 |
稼働時間 | 2 時間 10 分 |
Amazon 新生活SALE (Final) を今すぐチェック
この商品を見た後にお客様が購入した商品
商品の説明
いま、オズ 対 魔女たちの戦いが幕を開ける
「スパイダーマン」3部作の監督とディズニーが贈る
大ヒット、ファンタジー・アドベンチャー
『オズ はじまりの戦い DVD(デジタルコピー付き)』
『アリス・イン・ワンダーランド』などの至高のファンタジー・ムービーを世に贈り続けてきたディズニーが、「スパイダーマン」3部作のサム・ライミ監督と手を組んだ、圧倒的な映像美と心を揺さぶる躍動感、そして最高のスケール感を兼ね備えたファンタジー・アドベンチャー作品。
作家ライマン・フランク・ボームが生んだ伝説的魔法使い、“オズ"。謎に包まれたこの魔法使いはどのように誕生したのか?本作は自己中心的で信用されない男オスカーが、数奇な運命に導かれ、“偉大なるオズ"になるまでの、誰もが知りたい“オズ"の誕生を描いた物語!
主人公オズには、「スパイダーマン」3部作のジェームズ・フランコ、魔法の国の未来をかけてオズと共に戦う<南の魔女>グリンダには、ミシェル・ウィリアムズ。強大な魔力を持つ<東の魔女>エヴァノラにはオスカー女優のレイチェル・ワイズ、その妹で純粋だが、心に激しい情熱を秘めた<西の魔女>セオドラにはミラ・クニスと、3人の美しい魔女たちが壮絶なるドラマを華やかに彩ります。
<ストーリー>
サーカス一座の手品師オズは、その魅力と口の上手さを武器に、いつか「偉大な男」になることを夢見ていたが、ある日、竜巻に飛ばされて魔法の国オズに迷いこんでしまう。
たまたま名前が同じために、この国の予言に残る<伝説の魔法使い>だと誤解されたオズは、この国を支配しているという邪悪な魔女を倒すことを依頼される。
財宝と名声に目がくらんだオズは、翼の生えた猿や陶器の少女と出会いながら邪悪な魔女のいる南を目指すのだが…。
果たして、邪悪な魔女とは何者なのか、そして、オズは「偉大な男」になることができるのだろうか?
オズの国の未来をかけた魔女たちとの戦いが、いま、幕を開ける。
<ボーナス・コンテンツ>
●ウォルトの思い:映画化への道のり
●NGシーン集
<同時発売>
『オズ はじまりの戦い 3Dスーパー・セット(2枚組/デジタルコピー付き)』
『オズ はじまりの戦い ブルーレイ(デジタルコピー付き)』
『オズ はじまりの戦い ブルーレイ+DVDセット』
※商品情報は変更になる場合があります。
登録情報
- アスペクト比 : 1.78:1
- メーカーにより製造中止になりました : いいえ
- 言語 : 英語, 日本語
- 製品サイズ : 25 x 2.2 x 18 cm; 100 g
- EAN : 4959241927712
- 監督 : サム・ライミ
- メディア形式 : 字幕付き, ドルビー, 吹き替え, 色, ワイドスクリーン
- 時間 : 2 時間 10 分
- 発売日 : 2013/8/2
- 出演 : ジェームズ・フランコ, ミラ・クニス, レイチェル・ワイズ, ミシェル・ウィリアムズ, ザック・ブラフ
- 字幕: : 英語, 日本語
- 言語 : 日本語 (Dolby Digital 5.1), 英語 (Dolby Digital 5.1)
- 販売元 : ウォルト・ディズニー・ジャパン株式会社
- ASIN : B00CRSFKIK
- ディスク枚数 : 1
- Amazon 売れ筋ランキング: - 170,249位DVD (DVDの売れ筋ランキングを見る)
- - 1,456位外国のファンタジー映画
- - 1,654位外国のアドベンチャー映画
- カスタマーレビュー:
-
トップレビュー
上位レビュー、対象国: 日本
レビューのフィルタリング中に問題が発生しました。後でもう一度試してください。
主役のオズ役には当初ロバート・ダウニー・Jrにオファーされましたが彼は興味を示さず、次にジョニー・デップにオファーされましたが彼は同じディズニーの「ローン・レンジャー」の契約を優先しました(こちらは興行的大失敗に終わってしまった)。そして次にオファーされたのがジェームズ・フランコでした。私個人的にはハマリ役だったのではと思います。
ちなみに私は「クイック&デッド」以来サム・ライミ監督の大ファンでして、最近作の「ドクター・ストレンジ/マルチバース・オブ・マッドネス」も超楽しかった♪
「オズ はじまりの戦い」個人的には大好きで、おすすめです!
魔女姉妹の目で見るこの作品は主人公ドロシーが出てこないけど見応え有る作品になっていると思います。
元祖に習って始まりは白黒でオズの国に着いてからはカラーという忠実な感じも気に入っています。
構成自体は面白かったです。
ただ、悪役があまりパンチがない気がしました。
子供向けだからそこはしょうがないとは思いますが。
そこに生まれ育つ勇気と愛。
今回もその王道を行くような作品です。
口が達者で、まるでペテン師のような奇術師オズ。
とうとうある日、巡回サーカスから逃げ出す羽目になり
乗り込んだ気球が巨大な竜巻に巻き込まれ、不思議な世界に辿り着く。
そこは オズの国
生来のお調子者がその場限りの口約束、悪運強く切り抜けながら
邪悪な魔女からこの国を取り戻すためにやって来た、
伝説の魔法使いになりすますのだが・・・
オズの魔法使いの前日談。
魔法の国、夢の世界が色鮮やかに描かれています。
登場するキャラクターは個性的、愛すべき者たち。
特に核となる三人の女性の美しいこと、あれは紛れもなく魔女です。
定番だと思いつつ、最後まで楽しめたのは、
ディズニーの魔法は巨大で、その魔法が解けることはないから。
カラーになってからの 感動の為に必要なのです。
サウンド:9.1chサラウンドシステムでの視聴です。
サラウンドは、ディズニーお得意のDTS-HD-MAの7.1chで、環境音等かなり派手目にサラウンドします。
(吹き替えは音質が悪いので観ません)
私の好きなのは、気球が竜巻に飲み込まれる所の7chフルに使ってぐるぐる回るサラウンドです。
画質もかなり良く、2013年発売のBDでは最高の部類ではないでしょうか?
画像のギミックも楽しく、最初の白黒の画面では4:3画面かと思って見ていると、鳩や炎が黒帯の部分に飛び出して行き驚きます。
シアター組んでいる方で、ファンタジー物が受け入れられるならリファレンスに購入しても損はないです。
他の国からのトップレビュー



WARNING: ***SPOILER ALERT*** Some things discussed in this review could potentially spoil some of the film for those who have not yet seen it. Therefore, if you have not seen it, read onward at your own choice.
Okay, first thing is first: This review is NOT about the packaging decisions made by Disney for this set or their decision to sell the 3D version separately. I agree with most that it is corporate greed and is quite despicable, but that is not what I am here to review because most everyone can come to that conclusion themselves without people ranting about it endlessly in the reviews. No, this review is an actual critique of the film, so if you are here to get a sense of whether the film's (and thus this set's) actual content is something you're interested in, this review is for you. Naturally, I saw the film in theaters and am writing this review based upon my viewing of the film and observations made during that viewing. I shall attempt to go over the positives and negatives associated with the film in a fair way that can allow others who have not yet seen the film to draw their own conclusions from hopefully.
Before I get into specifics, I would like to take this opportunity to recognize that, given the material the film is coming from and the ENORMOUS shadow it had to work in from the 1939 film, one should not judge this film overly harshly. I think we all know that no Oz film is going to ever fully eclipse the much-beloved and universally cherished 1939 film with Judy Garland and Margaret Hamilton. Hence, to even try to overcome such a monumental production is a fool's errand, but so too is the idea of judging any new effort to reboot the Oz saga by comparison to the 1939 film alone. I myself have been a lifelong lover of the 1939 film, ever since I was a small child, and it remains one of the most beloved movies in my collection to this day. I came into this film knowing going in that it would not likely overcome the sheer splendor and magic of the 1939 film, but I also came into it with an open mind and a curiosity to see how they could potentially bring the Oz story into the 21st century. This is how I would suggest all who have not seen it yet to go into it: go in with an open mind and with no preconceptions about the film as best you can.
PROS:
1) BRIDGING IDEAS FROM THE 1939 FILM WITH IDEAS FROM THE BOOKS: This film did an excellent job of paying homage to the original 1939 film in several ways (i.e. scenes in Kansas were in black and white while Oz was in full color, hints at Dorothy Gale's heritage and eventual coming, the presence and familial relation of the Wicked Witch of the West and the Wicked Witch of the East, foreshadowing the Wicked Witch of the West's weakness to water, the classic green-skin variation of the Wicked Witch of the West's look made popular by Margaret Hamilton, Glinda's use of bubbles for transportation, foreshadowing the presence of Dorothy Gale's three friends in Oz, the Wizard's illusions that allowed him to use a projection of his head to speak with authority, etc.) while also addressing several things that were absent from the 1939 film and yet present in the original novels (i.e. Dainty China Country, mentioning of the former King of Oz, Quadlings, Winkies, etc.)
2) ACTING: This is something that cuts both ways, as some actors/actresses were well-suited to their roles going in, while others clearly needed some time to grow into their roles. Examples of the former include Mila Kunis and Rachel Weiz, who give absolutely stunning performances as the Wicked Witch of the West (Theodora) and the Wicked Witch of the East (Evanora) respectively. I must take my hat off to Mila Kunis especially, who had HUGE shoes to fill in taking on the role of Theodora, the eventual Wicked Witch of the West, a role which had previously been immortalized by the performance of Margaret Hamilton in the 1939 classic. Kunis put a stupendous modern spin on the character while also paying homage to the foundations for the character that were laid by Margaret Hamilton more than 70 years ago, portraying Theodora in a way many girls like her today could empathize with initially while eventually transitioning her into the classic green-skinned Wicked Witch of the West we all know so well. The same goes for Weiz, who finally gives screen-viewers some insight into the character of the Wicked Witch of the East. She is portrayed as the elder and quite deceitful sister of Theodora who was adviser to and later murdered the last King of Oz so as to take control of Oz herself while framing his daughter, Glinda the Good Witch of the South, for the crime. Both delivered compelling performances that left me wanting to see more of them in the films to come, as did Michelle Williams, who also gave an outstanding performance as the Good Witch Glinda as well as her counterpart in Kansas, Annie, who is foreshadowed to be the mother of Dorothy Gale. I suppose the biggest test any actor or actress faces in portraying a character is leaving the viewer with the desire to see more of them in films to come, and I can definitely say these three more than cleared that bar definitely.
3) VISUALS: This film WOWED me with the visuals and bright colors shown throughout the film. Just as its great predecessor did before it, the film showed the contrast between black and white filming with colorized scenery, and the result couldn't have been more appealing. The bright colors and scenery of the Land of Oz nearly jump right out of the screen at you, and the effect will likely have kids oooing and ahhing over it for sure. The picture quality is simply amazing (see the China Girl for a prime example of this).
4) CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT: While some may disagree with this, as an Oz enthusiast for over 25 years, I was pleasantly surprised and pleased by the character development over the course of the film. Some of the biggest and most well-done examples of character development in the film are that of Oscar Diggs (the Wizard) and Theodora (the Wicked Witch of the West). The film does a good job of showing the Wizard's transition from a petty con-man to the great and wonderful Wizard of Oz we were introduced to in the 1939 film. For example, we are shown that Oscar was originally a womanizing con-man and illusionist that had a dubious set of ethical standards. Over the course of the film, we see him mature and learn from his mistakes and their consequences (the hard way in some cases i.e. the transformation of Theodora). The other biggest example lies with the character of Theodora herself. We are shown the HUGE contrast with how she was originally compared to the version of her we are all most familiar with. In the beginning, we are shown she is a compassionate, beautiful young witch who has the best interests of Oz at heart. Having fallen in love with the Wizard upon his arrival in Oz, Theodora's heart is broken when her sister deceives her and convinces her that he has tried to court all of the three primary witches in Oz. It is at this moment of utter heartbreak that Theodora's tears leave burning scars on her face (foreshadowing her weakness to water that would one day be exploited by Dorothy Gale) and she is deceived into eating a green apple that her sister promises will remove all her heartache. This is however proven to be a deception, as the apple's effects cause Theodora's heart to rot and die, eventually disintegrating altogether. As a result, her face is distorted and her skin is turned a bright shade of green. Donning her now all-black attire including a black pointed hat, she assumes her new identity as the Wicked Witch of the West. Mila Kunis delivers a stunning performance to bring this character development to life for us, and it is a real treat to behold. These are just a couple of examples of the good character development over the course of the film.
CONS
1) ACTING: As stated above, this cuts both ways. While the bulk of the cast did outstanding, I will say there is one example where this was lacking in particular. That rested with the titular character (Oscar Diggs) and its actor (James Franco). There were times throughout the film that one could tell Franco was perhaps not the best choice to portray the role of the Wizard. Some examples include over-the-top moments of dialogue ("Zim-zala-bim! Begone coward! Fear my greatness!") and his at times awkward moments in the role. However, I do feel that by the end of the film, Franco had found his stride and was finally comfortable in the role, especially by the time of the film's climax in the battle for control of the Emerald City. The biggest times I noticed this awkwardness/woodenness was earlier in the film, and it is true that initially I felt that perhaps another actor may have been better suited to the role of the Wizard. But by the end, I do feel Franco has grown comfortable and competent enough to continue in the role and perfect his handle on the character.
2) LACK OF A CENTRAL MORAL TO THE STORY: Whereas there was a clear lesson we learned alongside Dorothy during her experience in the Land of Oz depicted in the 1939 classic, it wasn't as clear in this film that there was a central moral to be learned from the story. Whereas Dorothy learned to appreciate and cherish what she already possessed in life, it is unclear what moral Oscar was to learn from his initial experience in Oz. I suppose we may learn that even though some of us may not feel important or powerful, our own personal strengths can make up the difference if we put our minds to it. Beyond that, I was left wondering what we as an audience were supposed to learn from Oscar's experience. It is clear he became a better man and finally learned from his mistakes in the end, but the overall lesson he was to learn was not entirely clear.
3) USE OF STRENGTHS: One of the biggest gripes I had with the film was not in what it lacked, but in what it did possess but which it did not use enough in my estimation. A very big example of this was with the character of Theodora. While we are given a decent amount of screen time to get acquainted with her in her original form as Theodora The Good, we are not given nearly as much time to see her in her classical form of the Wicked Witch of the West. Mila Kunis gave such a wonderful performance as Theodora, and yet when she was at her best and clearly having the most fun with the role (that of her wicked form), we were not given nearly as much screen time to see her fully in action. While Evanora and Glinda have their face-off, Theodora simply flees the city to the West on her recently-acquired broomstick. While it is clear we will see them all again including the Wicked Witch of the West, I still wish they would have given her more screen time to further demonstrate her effectiveness in the role of the witch. This was not the only example of this, but you get the picture.
4) OVER-RELIANCE UPON CGI: One thing that the 1939 classic proved was that it is possible to be highly compelling and visually stunning without Computer Generated Imagery. While the special effects in the film were quite attractive to the eye, there were times (especially over the course of the Wizard's journey through Oz) that it bordered upon overkill. The beauty of the 1939 classic was that we didn't have to have a lot of fancy special effects from computers to make us fall in love with the film. Not that all computer-generated effects are bad, in fact many genuinely did add to the visual beauty of the film. It is just a small complaint when they seemed a little over the top, such as when the Wizard was swept into the twister and transported by it to Oz.
BOTTOM LINE: This was an excellent opening overall to a promising reboot of the Oz saga. As I noted in the beginning, no Oz-related film is ever going to fully eclipse the 1939 classic in the hearts and minds of the American public. However, considering the immense shadow cast over the film by the 1939 film, this film did a much better job than some would expect in measuring up in terms of quality and substance. It is easy to judge this film and others related to the Land of Oz by the standards of the 1939 classic, but that can at times seem a bit unfair, considering how monumental the earlier film is. If some are always looking for the perfection of the 1939 classic in every Oz-related film, I am afraid they will almost always be disappointed. If one can come into this with an open mind however, it is a HUGE treat indeed overall. For those that have not seen the film and are on the fence about it, I STRONGLY encourage you to give this film a shot. It puts a wonderful modern spin on Baum's classic stories, and that is something that is definitely to be celebrated. I am sure especially that somewhere, Margaret Hamilton is likely smiling about the new take on the character which caused her to be immortalized in cinema history.

I`ve never been impressed with James Franco until this film-Not only is he the lead but he`s playing a character whose moral compass is often trying to point in several directions at the same time.Mila Kunis is also very impressive,even though her character could be less silly-It`s my one real gripe-I suppose it has to pay homage to the original-but she nearly makes it work.The monkey and china girl are the best but they do get the best lines.
The Wizard is a trickster and those expecting big fight scenes,or a film like the Judy Garland original are likely to be disappointed,but this film is about brains and not brawn,and an attempt to recreate the original would only appeal to the biggest fans.With all those preconceptions and expectations maybe this film was never going to be a runaway success,but this is Raimis best film since Evil Dead 2.And that was 30 years ago.

un petit prestidigitateur OZ
se retrouve au pays d'Oz
et tout le monde le prends pour un grand magicien
et il doit combattre une méchante fée
une image splendide
au couleurs chatoyantes sans fausses notes
claire comme du cristal nette sans bavure
de nuit comme de jour
des décors féeriques GRANDIOSE
Une 3 d pharaonique
profondeur abyssale vertigineuse
des hauteurs magnifiques
des jaillissements énormes
des oiseaux des fleurs et bien d'autre choses
sortent de vôtre écran
une SPLENDEUR
Le son un DTS AUDIO MASTER 5.1
magnifique aucunes enceintes
ne travaillent pas
étourdissant envoutant SUBLIME
le caisson de basse lui aussi n'est pas en reste
en un mot GRANDIOSE
La vo en dts 7.1 AUDIO MASTER PLUS PUISSANT
et sublime
des effets spéciaux majestueux
une image 2.35 ne génant aucunement pour la 3d sublime
je n'ai trouvé aucuns défaut à ce film
j'en aurais bien pris pour 1 heure de plus
pourtant il dure plus de 2 heures
foncez et vous retrouverez vôtre âme d'enfant
cordialement